A company with an integrated energy project that monetizes isolated gas reserves by generating electricity and transmitting it to market claimed that natural gas market changes should trigger royalty formula adjustments. Mr. Pabon’s team represented the respondent in the resulting dispute, conducting economic and commercial analyses of the royalty adjustment clause, and demonstrating that the company’s claim for damages was baseless because it did not compete with other gas suppliers and that the project as defined did not constitute a market. Essentially, the team showed that the company was trying to create an alternative, flawed argument of contract infeasibility.